Craving
Fruit Brute
Since 1983.
Fruit Brute
Since 1983.
OFFICIAL
CONTEST WINNER!
RETRORATING: 17
Forum » Chew The Fat » The Café
|
|
|
Divided by 2 it's 21
|
|
echidna64 wrote :Wow. If only I had known that earlier, I would have been looking forward to it instead of dreading it. But that means that it's all downhill from here. thecrow174 wrote :True. That's one good thing. You love this signature.
|
|
Anybody know of a model of home video camera that can record video at very high resolutions? I have a decent one, but I need one that can record super crisp, beautiful video.
You love this signature.
|
|
And the new MacGyver is...
"If you think a 401K is your mother-in-law's bra size, you might be a redneck."
|
|
When was the last time you hooked up a game system with one of these?
You love this signature.
|
|
Vaporman87 wrote :I never did, thank god. I've heard those things were the absolute worst. *Insert funny signature here*
|
|
Vaporman87 wrote : Most you tubers use DSLR cameras, like a Nikon D5000. Lighting plays the most important part in video quality though. |
|
Thanks V. I'll do some research on them.
You love this signature.
|
|
So glad that Mr. Disney isn't alive to see his company's downfall.
"If you think a 401K is your mother-in-law's bra size, you might be a redneck."
|
|
thecrow174 wrote :I understand not forcing pastors to perform same-sex marriages. That should not happen. However, if you're a government official, you might as well figure that you're going to have to follow the letter of the law. If you don't like that, quit. Quit in protest and let your voice be heard on the issue. I complain that I hate how government officials don't perform their legal duties when it comes to arresting and assisting in the deportation of illegals (which has resulted in the murder of too many innocent people). I can't pick and choose what laws I do and don't want government officials to obey, tempting as it may be. With regard to protection for faith-based businesses, that's tricky. But the bottom line is that employers should always reserve the right to hire and fire freely, without giving a reason. They spent their lives building up a business, taking risks, forming relationships, and developing a reputation in their communities. If they don't want to hire someone because they feel it will be detrimental to their business, that should be their prerogative. If those employers are doing so just because of the color of someone's skin, or their sexual orientation, or whatever, that's against the law already. But again, employers will likely receive many applicants for a position (what with practically 1/3 of us unemployed - yeah, that 5% unemployment rate is absolute fantasy), so you simply select the individual you think will best benefit your business. Nobody gets hurt. Nobody can say they were discriminated against. Follow that rule, and you should be okay as an employer, without need for MORE laws. I'm Vaporman87, and I approved this message. You love this signature.
|