RetroDaze
You will
never be
forgotten.
never be
forgotten.
RETRORATING: 12
RETRORATING: 16
OFFICIAL
Forum Comments List
Displaying 29061-29070 of 49036 results.
| ID | Thread | Description | Posted By | Posted On | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20755 | General suggestions | I agree. I've always had a hard time browsing articles here. <br> | shakin steak | May 20, 2015 |  |
| 20754 | Guess that Game! | I challenge you guys to guess this NES game, come at me bro!<div><br></div><div><img src="/images/postImages/1432143861Mystery.jpg"></div> | echidna64 | May 20, 2015 | |
| 20753 | General suggestions | Hey guys! Please feel free to call shenanigans if I'm the only one with this issue, but I have a hard time finding the older articles. It seems as is they were not featured/contest winners/or recent, they have faded into obscurity which is a shame because there is a lot of damn good writing on here.<div><br></div><div>What I'm suggesting is a more comprehensive way to browse our article library. Instead of being brought to a random article when clicking the "articles" button on the homepage, maybe we could have an index sort of like on RJ-</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.retrojunk.com/article-index/new">Article Index </a></div><div><br></div><div>One of the cool things is that it organizers articles by their ratings which could help the casual reader find some great articles.</div><div><br></div><div>What do you guys think? Would an article index be feasible?</div> | echidna64 | May 20, 2015 | |
| 20752 | Tomorrowland | <blockquote rel="echidna64"><b>echidna64 wrote :</b><br><i> Early reviews not looking so hot for Tomorrowland </i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote>I've heard it's pretty good. But the third act throws it off. I'll still see it regardless. If anything for how it looks and a few actors in it.<br> | ThatDudeintheHoodie | May 20, 2015 | |
| 20751 | Last Movie You Watched | Romeo Must Die<br><br>Shakespeare's tragedy <span style="font-style: italic;">Romeo and Juliet </span>with a Matrix twist. I thought it was okay for a modern rendition. Good bit of martial arts and shooting.<br><br>3 stars. <br><br><br> | Mr Magic | May 20, 2015 | |
| 20750 | Tomorrowland | Early reviews not looking so hot for Tomorrowland | echidna64 | May 20, 2015 | |
| 20749 | Last Movie You Watched | Episode III: Revenge of the Sith<div><br></div><div>7/10 Although it's the best of the prequel trilogy, it is still a mostly brain dead movie which is a shame because everyone behind the scenes is putting their hearts and souls into ship designs, creature designs, and more.</div><div><br></div><div>The main faults are the choppy storytelling, the terrible dialogue (Anakin's response to Obi Wan in their "final" battle- "In my point of view, the Jedi are evil"), and Hayden Christensen's wooden acting.</div><div><br></div><div>I can't wait for Episode VII </div> | echidna64 | May 20, 2015 | |
| 20748 | Jem and the Holograms | Interesting essay, Caps.<br><br>I don't categorically denigrate new versions. There's lots of cover songs I like. Some better than the originals. I haven't seen the new Mad Max movie yet but it looks awesome. TMNT have gone through many incarnations, and (latest movie notwithstanding) I like most of them better than the Fred Wolf cartoon. <br><br>But in allowing myself to have conflict with new versions, I don't have any inner conflict. It's OK to say something is bad. Andrew Garfield Spider-Man reboot: pointless. LoZ Skyward Sword: annoying AF. Jem & the Holograms movie: runs roughshod over major facets of the cartoon, whether or not Synergy is there.<br><br><blockquote rel="blueluigi"><b>blueluigi wrote :</b><br><i> It sounds like Stefanie said this as a damage control statement.<br> </i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote>Yup!<br><br> <img src="/images/postImages/1432129663jem goon.JPG"><br>PS: Jem looks really happy and surprised about the prerecorded sound that's coming out of her guitar all by itself.<br><br> | shakin steak | May 20, 2015 | |
| 20747 | Jem and the Holograms | I find what Stefanie Scott said really hard to believe.<br><br>She is right about the fact that you can't show everything in the movie all in one trailer. Especially when they're trying to surprise you in the actual film. But at the same time, the trailer also needs to excite the audience. Even if what she says is true and the movie actually does turn out to be a faithful adaptation of the original show, the damage is already done, and the movie isn't likely to succeed because of it.<br><br>I know my first thoughts on the trailer that I mentioned earlier in this thread is that they're trying to target a different audience. Though that was when my mind was still processing what I've seen in the trailer. If it were under a different name, I'd still stand by it. But the fact of the matter is that people were expecting much better from the movie. I really do think that a movie based off Jem and the Holograms, if done properly, could turn out to be amazing. Especially when it's brought through in this modern digital age. The fact that it ended up being something different is a complete letdown.<br><br>I kind of hope that what she said is true and that the movie ends up being great, and that the person who made the trailer just royally screwed up. But from what I've seen, I can't really picture seeing this movie doing anything to redeem itself. It sounds like Stefanie said this as a damage control statement.<br> | blueluigi | May 20, 2015 | |
| 20746 | How was your day? | <blockquote rel="vkimo"><b>vkimo wrote :</b><br><i> No gray hairs, just thinning ones. <img src="http://www.retro-daze.org/images/smilies/MavCry.gif"> </i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote>Don't feel bad. My father's side has early balding and guess who's hair is already retreating? My brother is about 26 or 27 and is nearly bald.<br> | ThatDudeintheHoodie | May 20, 2015 | |
