RetroDaze
All your memories are belong to us.
RETRORATING: 13
RETRORATING: 12
RETRORATING: 12
Forum Comments List
Displaying 10411-10420 of 49553 results.
| ID | Thread | Description | Posted By | Posted On | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40394 | DC Films | <blockquote rel="Superman"><b>Superman wrote :</b><br><i> <blockquote rel="shakin steak"><b>shakin steak wrote :</b><br><i><br> I also agree, Superman. But that still doesn't explain why they don't understand their own characters enough to figure out that very basic info. It seems like they are just greedy and going for the cash, you can't make a good product that way. Especially in entertainment. Maybe it's because Stan Lee is still here and producing Marvel's stuff. Who does DC have working on movies, in the way of recognizable names that have been with the company forever? </i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote><br><div>Does Stan Lee (or anybody who actually worked in the comic industry) have any creative input in the Marvel movies, though? I was under the impression that Kevin Feige (who is a film producer) was the main force behind the movies. The same is likely true of the DC films, though I have seen Geoff Johns (a comic book writer who has written a ton of DC Comics) credited in the movies. The question is, though, how much of a voice does he have? I think people who are actually involved in the comics may be used for consultation purposes for all of these movies, but film producers and directors have a much bigger voice than people who have actually worked in the comic industry. Marvel's movies just happen to have a better person filling that role of producer.</div> </i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote><br><div>I don't know of the creative influences, but it seems that those who are working on the MCU films have a much better understanding of the characters and how to translate them to film. Whether this is a result of the culture of the company, the studio talent being more aware and influenced by the source material, or some other reason... it shows in pretty much every way.</div><div><br></div><div>I could be wrong here, but just from trailers of upcoming DC projects, Shazam! looks like the closest thing to an MCU product that DC has worked on.</div> | Vaporman87 | Aug 04, 2018 |  |
| 40392 | DC Films | <blockquote rel="shakin steak"><b>shakin steak wrote :</b><br><i> I also agree, Superman. But that still doesn't explain why they don't understand their own characters enough to figure out that very basic info. It seems like they are just greedy and going for the cash, you can't make a good product that way. Especially in entertainment. Maybe it's because Stan Lee is still here and producing Marvel's stuff. Who does DC have working on movies, in the way of recognizable names that have been with the company forever? </i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote><br><div>Does Stan Lee (or anybody who actually worked in the comic industry) have any creative input in the Marvel movies, though? I was under the impression that Kevin Feige (who is a film producer) was the main force behind the movies. The same is likely true of the DC films, though I have seen Geoff Johns (a comic book writer who has written a ton of DC Comics) credited in the movies. The question is, though, how much of a voice does he have? I think people who are actually involved in the comics may be used for consultation purposes for all of these movies, but film producers and directors have a much bigger voice than people who have actually worked in the comic industry. Marvel's movies just happen to have a better person filling that role of producer.</div> | Superman | Aug 04, 2018 | |
| 40391 | DC Films | I also agree, Superman. But that still doesn't explain why they don't understand their own characters enough to figure out that very basic info. It seems like they are just greedy and going for the cash, you can't make a good product that way. Especially in entertainment. Maybe it's because Stan Lee is still here and producing Marvel's stuff. Who does DC have working on movies, in the way of recognizable names that have been with the company forever? | shakin steak | Aug 04, 2018 | |
| 40390 | Lunchables | <div>Back in my day Lunchables used to come with Dijon mustard in a squeeze pack for your cracker sandwich. It made the perfect faux bird dropping when applied to a windshield of a vehicle from about two feet up. Little brown spots and everything. They also came with an Andes mint.<br></div><div><br></div><img src="/images/postImages/1533331551350ca0f511f693a6e4667ee9d2d2837a.jpg"><div><br></div><div>I still get lunchables occasionally for my boys. I also use them canyoneering since they are sealed but usually the uploaded versions or other various brands of protein pack.</div> | NLogan | Aug 03, 2018 | |
| 40389 | The Café | I think I'll see the new Jurassic World flick, regardless of how bad it might be. | Mr Magic | Aug 03, 2018 | |
| 40388 | The Café | when i went to go see incredibles 2 with my stepdad he actually hated it and thought fallen kingdom would be better. and, guess what? he did think it was better. | Benjanime | Aug 03, 2018 | |
| 40387 | Terminator 6 | <blockquote rel="Vaporman87"><b>Vaporman87 wrote :</b><br><i> <blockquote rel="Rick Ace Rhodes"><b>Rick Ace Rhodes wrote :</b><br><i><div>Personally, Terminator is the first two movies. Everything after T2 I cut off. I don't pay any attention to the story lines that came with T3 and afterwards.</div> </i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote>It seems that the team behind T6 agrees with you, so they are picking up where T2 left off, and ignoring all others. <a href="https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/m/ab7d1a5f-0108-3a40-87c7-614c1a7487ce/the-first-look-at-linda.html">Here is a first look</a> at Linda Hamilton in her T6 getup. <br> </i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote>Same, there is only T1 and T2 in my book.<div><br></div><div><img src="/images/postImages/1533313728starglasses.jpeg"></div> | echidna64 | Aug 03, 2018 | |
| 40386 | The Café | <blockquote rel="Rick Ace Rhodes"><b>Rick Ace Rhodes wrote :</b><br><i> Finally got around to seeing Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom. I don't know know what everyone else thought, but much like the previous one I did not like it. I felt like it was kind of dumb. Not as stupid in like Jurassic World but still dumb. And for a movie that's longer than Jurassic World, Fallen Kingdom actually felt pretty quick and short compared to it. I looked at my watch over an hour into the movie and was shocked to see that much time had already passed.<div><br></div><div>I also felt kind of robbed. All these scenes in the trailer of the dinosaurs encountering mankind and yet that doesn't happen till the very end. I hope the third film goes out of it's way to do more than these last two. It feels like we are just retreading water from the first two films of the original trilogy and not in a good way.</div> </i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote>I enjoyed it as a dumb popcorn flick just like the first Jurassic World. | ThatDudeintheHoodie | Aug 03, 2018 | |
| 40385 | The Café | Finally got around to seeing Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom. I don't know know what everyone else thought, but much like the previous one I did not like it. I felt like it was kind of dumb. Not as stupid in like Jurassic World but still dumb. And for a movie that's longer than Jurassic World, Fallen Kingdom actually felt pretty quick and short compared to it. I looked at my watch over an hour into the movie and was shocked to see that much time had already passed.<div><br></div><div>I also felt kind of robbed. All these scenes in the trailer of the dinosaurs encountering mankind and yet that doesn't happen till the very end. I hope the third film goes out of it's way to do more than these last two. It feels like we are just retreading water from the first two films of the original trilogy and not in a good way.</div> | Rick Ace Rhodes | Aug 03, 2018 | |
| 40384 | 1929 - Interviews with the Elderly with Sound | <blockquote rel="vkimo" style="">To me it always feels a little strange seeing old people in things like The Marx Bros. or silent films...I can't exactly articulate why, though. Maybe because those things are so old already it's hard to picture somebody being old when they were still brand new or recent.</blockquote><blockquote rel="vkimo" style="font-weight: normal;"><b><br></b></blockquote><blockquote rel="vkimo" style="font-weight: normal;"><b>vkimo wrote :</b><br><i> Holy smokes, thanks for sharing! Crazy how the last living Confederate Soldier died in the 1950s </i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote>There exists a photo of some country singer (can't remember his name) playing a song at his deathbed. I'll try to see if I can find it. | jkatz | Aug 02, 2018 | |
