You will
never be
forgotten.
Castles of Yesteryear

RETRORATING: 12

Retro Rooms

CONTEST WINNER!

Birthday Or BUST!

RETRORATING: 10

Back to Forum Page

Forum Comments List

Displaying 17321-17330 of 49017 results.
IDThreadDescriptionPosted ByPosted On 
 
32853What song are you listening to?<blockquote rel="eddstarr"><b>eddstarr wrote :</b><br><i> It sure seems to me that the last decades of the 20th Century are a tough act to follow.<div><br></div><div>Love reliving the good times here, with you guys!</div><div><b>-end quote</b></div></i></blockquote>Likewise Edd. Let the good times roll.<br><br><br><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7BDBzgHXf64" allowfullscreen="" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0"></iframe>Vaporman87Jan 06, 2017View
32852The Goldbergs<blockquote rel="SockofFleagulls"><b>SockofFleagulls wrote :</b><br><i> I just read today that Kevin Smith is directing a Batman 89 themed episode this season!<div style="font-weight: normal;"><br></div><div><b><a href="http://www.denofgeek.com/us/tv/the-goldbergs/261267/kevin-smith-to-direct-batman-themed-episode-of-the-goldbergs">Den of Geek</a></b></div> </i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote>Woah! No way! That is awesome. I love it when they involve other retro geeks in the show, and to have a Keaton Batman episode is even better. I imagine there will be some reference to Keaton as Batman being a bad idea, only to have that change after seeing the movie.<br>Vaporman87Jan 06, 2017View
32851Voltron Legendary Defender Season 2 TrailerI caught the first few episodes of season one and thought that they were really well done, with a good mix of adventure and humor. Glad to see it performed well enough to warrant a second season. Hopefully I can get caught up the first season sometime soon.<br>Vaporman87Jan 06, 2017View
32850Malls Across AmericaThat is unfortunate. If this guy ever gets around to making official prints I'll definitely buy a few to support him.jkatzJan 06, 2017View
32849Malls Across America<font face="Arial, Verdana"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">It seems the photographer is a friend of a friend of a friend, or somewheres around that... I saw some <a href="https://www.facebook.com/mgalinsky/posts/10155055111286337">unfortunate background on this project </a>today:</span></font><div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;"><br></div><div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal;"><br></div><div><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6px; color: rgb(29, 33, 41); font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"></p><blockquote><b>Michael Galinsky wrote:</b><p></p><p style="margin: 0px 0px 6px; color: rgb(29, 33, 41); font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">So it goes again... No this site did not contact me before they posted 50 of my images.... so no they didn't pay me for it either. Neither has anyone else (except for the one company I sued and settled with - and no I can't say anything about it). The company that put out the book, Steidl, never paid me a cent and charged me 20 dollars a book for the 300 I needed for kickstarter backers... so I lost money on that too (I had budgeted 7 dollars a book and hadn't considred the 100 copies that would be shipped overseas). But I really did not shoot them for money. I shot them because I have always wanted/needed to make work. I was happy with these when I made them but was literally laughed at when I tried to bring them to a few galleries back in 1989/90. So they went in a drawer. When the came out 20 + years later they had aged nicely.</p><p style="margin: 6px 0px 0px; display: inline; color: rgb(29, 33, 41); font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">One would think that the images would have value as prints but I have not had any luck getting a gallery to give me the time of day. If you want to have a show in your gallery let me know- or tell your friend that runs one... This is just one of the half dozen times they've gone viral. and this will proably get shared 100k times which means a few million people will see them. So there's that. that is gratifying even if it is not renumerative. I think we'll make our own book some day. and so it will go again- hopefully</p></blockquote></div>shakin steakJan 06, 2017View
32847Favorite gaming developers<div><b style="font-size: 13.3333px;">Rick Ace Rhodes wrote :</b><br style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><i style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><blockquote rel="jkatz"><b>jkatz wrote :</b><br><i><br><blockquote rel="Rick Ace Rhodes"><b>Rick Ace Rhodes wrote :</b><br><i><br><br>I guess the one I really only like is Rockstar. Pretty much everything I played from them is good in some way, every other developer has had great stuff mixed with bad stuff.&nbsp;</i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote>Even Red Dead Revolver?&nbsp;</i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote>I never played Red Dead Revolver, however, looking at the game footage on YouTube it looks nothing more then more regressed version of Red Dead Redemption.&nbsp;</i><b style="font-size: 13.3333px;">-end quote</b></div><div><b style="font-size: 13.3333px;"><br></b></div><div><br></div>I remember the controls being unresponsive and most levels being...irritating. It was also too short.<div><br></div><div>However, I love Spaghetti Westerns and as a result I can't bring myself to completely hate a game that takes so much inspiration from them <a href="http://reddead.wikia.com/wiki/Red_Dead_Revolver_Soundtrack">and even uses their music.</a>&nbsp; It's definitely one of Rockstar's lesser games, though.</div>jkatzJan 06, 2017View
32846Favorite gaming developers<div>i could list many.</div><div><br></div><div>nintendo, sega, rockstar, squaresoft (now square enix) working designs, capcom, hal labs, and atlus to name a few.</div>BenjanimeJan 06, 2017View
32845Funko Pops<img src="/images/postImages/1483677504pop-last-week-tonight-john-oliver-vinyl-figurine.jpg"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>See what I mean? Ignoring the stupidity of making a John Oliver pop in the first place, you could just as easily market him as Rick Moranis. Or take his glasses off, put him on a different body, and now he's Hal from Malcom in the Middle! As for M.A.S.K., you'd have to be crazy to even consider selling a figure without a helmet, but Funko probably would. There's nothing to distinguish them from "Generic Blonde White Guy #3427" or "Generic Old General".</div><div><br></div><div>Sorry for the rant..I think I have a love/hate relationship with these things.&nbsp;</div><img src="http://retro-daze.org/images/smilies/p12.gif">jkatzJan 06, 2017View
32844Funko Pops<blockquote rel="ThatDudeintheHoodie"><b>ThatDudeintheHoodie wrote :</b><br><i> I got a lot of the pops, They are this year's beanie babies in my opinion, but you can make money off of these.&nbsp; </i><b>-end quote</b></blockquote>haha, I had this same thought. Definitely a lot of parallels.&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>These are the only two pops I own. The Gigantor is from a "collector" line that's ridiculously overpriced. I only bought him because he was on clearance. If (when) the public loses interest in these guys, I'll bank on it being because of the lack of interesting and creative designs. 90% of the pops are basically the same. And as pikachulover pointed out, likeness is an issue...</div><div><div><br></div><div><img src="/images/postImages/1483675707IMG_4302.JPG" style="font-size: 10pt;"></div></div>jkatzJan 06, 2017View
32843Funko PopsMy personal favorite is my Rick with the portal gun.&nbsp;ThatDudeintheHoodieJan 06, 2017View